<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>extractivism &#8211; Green Social Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greensocialthought.org/tag/extractivism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org</link>
	<description>Produce less. Distribute it fairly. Create a greener world for all.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Under Left and Right-Wing Leaders, the Amazon Has Burned. Can Latin America Reject Oil, Ranching, and Mining?</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/under-left-and-right-wing-leaders-amazon-has-burned-can-latin-america-reject-oil-ranching/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bauxite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-gen fuel cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Tide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare earth metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/under-left-and-right-wing-leaders-amazon-has-burned-can-latin-america-reject-oil-ranching/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Alexander Zaitchik</p>The chapter in Latin American history that opened in 1998 with celebrations in Venezuela has ended with a coup and violence in Bolivia. As with all tidal waves, the &#8220;pink tide&#8221; recedes to reveal a terrain transformed. The left movement landscape that produced variously striped socialist governments in a dozen countries is fractured and disillusioned. Central and South America face a resurgent right and the return of austerity, often through a scrim of tear gas. This state of disarray also marks the continent&#8217;s literal terrain: the forests and mountains cleared and ripped open, their minerals and hydrocarbons sent to port [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Alexander Zaitchik</p><p><!--StartFragment--><u>The chapter in</u> Latin American history that opened in 1998 with celebrations in Venezuela has ended with a coup and violence in Bolivia. As with all tidal waves, the &ldquo;pink tide&rdquo; recedes to reveal a terrain transformed. The left movement landscape that produced variously striped socialist governments in a dozen countries is fractured and disillusioned. Central and South America face a resurgent right and the return of austerity, often through a scrim of tear gas. This state of disarray also marks the continent&rsquo;s literal terrain: the forests and mountains cleared and ripped open, their minerals and hydrocarbons sent to port and shipped abroad in the name of a socialist project whose achievements have proven fragile, temporary, and superficial.<!--EndFragment-->&nbsp; <!--StartFragment-->Trying to maintain a &ldquo;green&rdquo; version of global consumer society could lead to a scramble for rare metals to make previous waves of extractivism look gentle by comparison.<!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>End the “Green” Delusions: Industrial-scale Renewable Energy is Fossil Fuel+</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/end-green-delusions-industrial-scale-renewable-energy-fossil-fuel/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[extractivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth imperative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neodymium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terbium]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/end-green-delusions-industrial-scale-renewable-energy-fossil-fuel/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Alexander Dunlap</p>Industrial-scale renewable energy does nothing to remake exploitative relationships with the earth, and instead&#160;represents the renewal and expansion of the present capitalist order.&#160;&#160;We have inherited the bad/good energy dichotomy of fossil fuels versus renewable energy, a holdover from the environmental movement of the 1970&#8217;s that is misleading, if not false.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Alexander Dunlap</p><p>Industrial-scale renewable energy does nothing to remake exploitative relationships with the earth, and instead&nbsp;represents the renewal and expansion of the present capitalist order.&nbsp;&nbsp;We have inherited the bad/good energy dichotomy of fossil fuels versus renewable energy, a holdover from the environmental movement of the 1970&rsquo;s that is misleading, if not false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the people building alternatives to mining in Colombia</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/meet-people-building-alternatives-mining-colombia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AngloGold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arracacha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cajamarca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractive industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monocultural crop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-glyphosate agricultur]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/meet-people-building-alternatives-mining-colombia/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Hannibal Rhoades and Benjamin Hitchcock Auciello</p>On the 26th March 2017, citizens from the mountainous municipality of Cajamarca, Colombia, voted, with a 98% majority, to ban South African miner AngloGold Ashanti&#8217;s vast La Colosa gold mining project, in a &#8216;popular consultation&#8217; led by grassroots youth activists and small-scale farmers. One year on, and Cajamarca&#8217;s victory has helped inspire a much wider movement of citizens and municipalities exercising their democratic right to participation. 9 other municipalities have held consultations, each rejecting planned mining, gas and oil projects with majorities above 90%. More than 70 others have indicated their intention to do the same.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Hannibal Rhoades and Benjamin Hitchcock Auciello</p><p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">O</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">n the 26th March 2017, citizens from the mountainous municipality of Cajamarca, Colombia, voted</span><a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/anthony-rond-n-camacho/cajamarca-minining-colombia" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">, with a 98% majority</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, to ban South African miner AngloGold Ashanti&rsquo;s vast La Colosa gold mining project, in a &lsquo;popular consultation&rsquo; led by grassroots youth activists and small-scale farmers.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One year on, and Cajamarca&rsquo;s victory has helped inspire a much wider movement of citizens and municipalities exercising their democratic right to participation. 9 other municipalities have held consultations, each rejecting planned mining, gas and oil projects with majorities above 90%. More than 70 others have indicated their intention to do the same.</span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some thoughts, self-criticisms and proposals concerning the process of change in Bolivia</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/some-thoughts-self-criticisms-and-proposals-concerning-process-change-bolivia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movement Towards Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Solon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/some-thoughts-self-criticisms-and-proposals-concerning-process-change-bolivia/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Pablo Solon</p>What has happened? How did we come to this? What occurred in the process of change that more than 15 years ago won its first victory with the water war? Why is it that a conglomeration of movements that wanted to change Bolivia ended up trapped in a referendum to allow two persons to be re-elected in 2019? &#160; &#160; To say that it&#8217;s all the work of the imperialist conspiracy is nonsensical. The idea of the referendum for re-election did not come from the White House but from the Palacio Quemado.[2] Now it is obvious that imperialism and the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Pablo Solon</p><div class="node" id="node-4816">
<div class="content"><span style="font-size: 11pt"><!--StartFragment-->What has happened? How did we come to this? What occurred in the process of change that more than 15 years ago won its first victory with the water war? Why is it that a conglomeration of movements that wanted to change Bolivia ended up trapped in a referendum to allow two persons to be re-elected in 2019?</span></div>
<div class="content">&nbsp;</div>
<div class="content"><span style="font-size: 11pt">&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 11pt"> To say that it&rsquo;s all the work of the imperialist conspiracy is nonsensical. The idea of the referendum for re-election did not come from the White House but from the Palacio Quemado.[2] Now it is obvious that imperialism and the entire ultra-right are benefiting from this great error, the calling of a referendum to enable two persons to be re-elected. <!--EndFragment--></span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to the Pink Tide?</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/what-happened-pink-tide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extractivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoliberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Tide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/what-happened-pink-tide/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Kyla Sankey</p>When the &#8220;pink tide&#8221; of left-leaning governments first rose to power on the back of anti-neoliberal protests across Latin America in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the initial reaction from the Left was euphoric. Striving to move beyond the &#8220;there is no alternative&#8221; mantra, many pinned their hopes on what seemed to be a new wave of actually existing alternatives to neoliberalism. Amidst the revolutionary fervor of social forums, solidarity alliances, and peoples&#8217; councils, it appeared an epochal shift was underway, which Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa optimistically dubbed &#8220;a genuine change in the times.&#8221; But in retrospect, the 2005 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Kyla Sankey</p><p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p><span class="dropcaps">W</span>hen the &ldquo;pink tide&rdquo; of left-leaning governments first rose to power on the back of anti-neoliberal protests across Latin America in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the initial reaction from the Left was euphoric. Striving to move beyond the &ldquo;there is no alternative&rdquo; mantra<em>, </em>many pinned their hopes on what seemed to be a new wave of actually existing alternatives to neoliberalism.</p>
<p>Amidst the revolutionary fervor of social forums, solidarity alliances, and peoples&rsquo; councils, it appeared an epochal shift was underway, which Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa optimistically dubbed &ldquo;a genuine change in the times.&rdquo;</p>
<p>But in retrospect, the 2005 political mobilizations that led to the defeat of the <a href="http://fpif.org/corporate-power-doesnt-always-win-remembering-ftaa/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Free Trade Area of the Americas</a> (FTAA) may have been the high point of the pink tide project. Since then, the balance of power has slowly shifted back towards the Right, with the popularity and efficacy of left-wing governments rapidly diminishing.</p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
