<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jobs &#8211; Green Social Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greensocialthought.org/tag/jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org</link>
	<description>Produce less. Distribute it fairly. Create a greener world for all.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>What Else is Wrong with Globalization</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/what-else-wrong-globalization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[eco-socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/what-else-wrong-globalization/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Joan Roelofs</p>It isn&#8217;t just an issue of whether they have the jobs or we have the jobs. From a red-green, eco-socialist perspective we must ask: what are they producing, how does the product and process affect the health, happiness and self-esteem of the worker, how does it contribute to the health and happiness of the consumer, and what effect do product and process have on the environment and culture of the producing and receiving countries? Globalization has benefits, undoubtedly. There are international human rights treaties that have enabled local activists to improve conditions for their fellow citizens; there are developments in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Joan Roelofs</p><div>It isn&rsquo;t just an issue of whether they have the jobs or we have the jobs. From a red-green, eco-socialist perspective we must ask: what are they producing, how does the product and process affect the health, happiness and self-esteem of the worker, how does it contribute to the health and happiness of the consumer, and what effect do product and process have on the environment and culture of the producing and receiving countries?</div>
<div>Globalization has benefits, undoubtedly. There are international human rights treaties that have enabled local activists to improve conditions for their fellow citizens; there are developments in medical treatments that are now widely available. But as the benefits of globalization are widely described, I will argue for the minority and indicate some of the serious problems that we don&rsquo;t hear much about.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the tar sands to ‘green jobs’?  Work and ecological justice</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/tar-sands-green-jobs-work-and-ecological-justice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 14:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipping point]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/tar-sands-green-jobs-work-and-ecological-justice/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Greg Albo and Lilian Yap</p>The ecological and social implications of climate change have &#8211; or should &#8211; become a central parameter for all discussions of work and capitalism. It is generally agreed that reliance on the burning of fossil fuels as the pre-eminent energy source for production and consumption over the history of capitalism is the critical factor in the ruinous greenhouse gas emissions triggering global warming, which would become irreversible if the earth&#39;s atmosphere were brought to a &#8216;tipping-point&#8217;. The leading scientific estimates project that a rise in average global temperatures of 2&#176;C (and now often just 1.5&#176;C) is the threshold for irreversible [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Greg Albo and Lilian Yap</p><p><!--StartFragment--><span style="font-size: 11pt">The ecological and social implications of climate change have &ndash; or should &ndash; become a central parameter for all discussions of work and capitalism. It is generally agreed that reliance on the burning of fossil fuels as the pre-eminent energy source for production and consumption over the history of capitalism is the critical factor in the ruinous greenhouse gas emissions triggering global warming, which would become irreversible if the earth&#39;s atmosphere were brought to a &lsquo;tipping-point&rsquo;. The leading scientific estimates project that a rise in average global temperatures of 2&deg;C (and now often just 1.5&deg;C) is the threshold for irreversible climate change; that this can be expected from an accumulation of 1 trillion metric tonnes of carbon in the atmosphere; that we are approaching 600 million tonnes; and that the carbon &lsquo;tipping-point&rsquo; may well be reached in 30 years unless carbon emissions can be reduced by 2-5% per year (and now often even more severe reductions).[1] The unrelenting build-up of greenhouse gases has led to the jarring conclusion, drawn by climatologists, ecological militants and union activists, that an exit from reliance on fossil fuels for energy needs to occur with some urgency.</span><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
