<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Judiciary Act of 1789 &#8211; Green Social Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greensocialthought.org/tag/judiciary-act-of-1789/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org</link>
	<description>Produce less. Distribute it fairly. Create a greener world for all.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How to Pack the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://www.greensocialthought.org/biodiversity-biodevastation/how-pack-supreme-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brown vs. Board of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dred Scott vs. Sandford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Act of 1789]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Roberts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gst.riz-om.network/reprint/how-pack-supreme-court/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>by Richard E. Rubenstein </p>Farewell to Anthony Kennedy, the one Justice who kept us guessing which way the Supreme Court would rule on a wide range of issues. With Kennedy gone and Trump honing his list of right-wing replacements, the Court&#8217;s decisions will very likely become more predictable &#8211; a prospect that makes progressive hearts sink.&#160; Nevertheless, there is no need to assume that the Court will have a conservative majority for the next generation, if not longer, and that there is nothing that can be done about it. This assumption is valid only&#160;if one considers the Supreme Court a sacred institution that can&#8217;t [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Richard E. Rubenstein </p><p><!--StartFragment--><span style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: &quot;Source Serif Pro&quot;,serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 27px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">Farewell to Anthony Kennedy, the one Justice who kept us guessing which way the Supreme Court would rule on a wide range of issues. With Kennedy gone and Trump honing his list of right-wing replacements, the Court&rsquo;s decisions will very likely become more predictable &ndash; a prospect that makes progressive hearts sink.&nbsp; Nevertheless, there is no need to assume that the Court will have a conservative majority for the next generation, if not longer, and that there is nothing that can be done about it. This assumption is valid </span><em style="background-color: transparent; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: &amp;quot;SSit&amp;quot;; font-size: 18px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 27px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; max-width: 560px; orphans: 2; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">only&nbsp;</em><span style="display: inline !important; float: none; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-family: &quot;Source Serif Pro&quot;,serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 27px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">if one considers the Supreme Court a sacred institution that can&rsquo;t be altered even by perfectly legal means &ndash; for example, by increasing the number of Justices.</span><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
