A Lakota prophecy tells of a mythic Black Snake that will move underground and bring destruction to the Earth. The “seventh sign” in Hopi prophecy involves the ocean turning black and bringing death to many sea-dwelling creatures. It doesn’t take an over-active imagination to make a connection between these images and oil pipelines and spills.

It’s troubling enough that the growing “Black Snake” has branched out at an alarming rate, forming a massive subterranean coast-to-coast web. But to make matters worse, the nefarious reptile seems to suffer from leaky gut syn­drome, so that it functions as a toxic underground sprinkler sys­tem, spreading gas, oil, and poi­sonous byproducts everywhere it goes—including into waterways and drinking water sources.

Protest actions against major pipelines such as the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipeline have called attention to the potentially devastating effects of pipelines, but much of the gen­eral public still doesn’t understand the scope of the existing and pro­posed pipeline network in the US and around the globe. Executive actions by Donald Trump just four days into his presidency practically guarantee expedited approval for DAPL, as well as for Keystone XL. This indicates, among other things, that the maze of oil and gas pipelines in the US will continue to expand at an unprecedented and reckless pace.

The US is already home to approximately 2.5 million miles of underground gas and oil pipeline. For the sake of comparison, only one other country exceeds 100,000 pipeline miles: Russia, with 161,502 miles. Canada places third, with just over 62,000 miles of pipeline, and all other countries fall far below that, with most containing fewer than 10,000 pipeline miles.

Over 72,000 miles of the US conduits carry crude oil, and more than 20 pipelines di­rectly threaten Native lands. The reach of the “Black Snake” is mind boggling, especially considering that every one of these pipelines has already contributed to or is al­most certain to contribute to the on­going devas­tation of Mother Earth.

Effectively opposing new pipe­lines and pipeline extensions will require the active participation of thou­sands, if not millions, of deter­mined citizens. Water is necessary for the life of every person on the planet, and the seriousness of the current situation compels each and every one of us to become involved to the greatest extent feasible.

The Dakota Access Pipeline remains a serious threat, not only to the water supply and sa­cred lands of the Standing Rock Sioux, but to all waterways and lands along the pipeline’s 1,200-mile path through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. This monstrosity is an environmen­tal disaster waiting to happen. The heroic water protectors at Standing Rock have achieved much, but now the ground they’ve gained must be fought for all over again. With the stroke of a poisonous presidential pen, Trump has already managed to betray both long-standing treaty and recent agreement, bringing dishonor and disgrace on the US government while jeopardizing water supplies and planetary well-being.

There are a number of other significant pipeline battles that must be fought with the same tenacity that the water protectors have shown at Standing Rock, including the Mountain Valley Pipeline, the Diamond Pipe­line, the Atlantic Sunrise expansion to the Transco Pipeline, the Trans­mountain Pipe­line expansion, the Bayou Bridge Pipeline, the Pilgrim Pipeline, the Trans-Pecos and Co­manche Trail Pipelines, the Algo­nquin Incremen­tal Pipeline, the Al­berta Clipper pipeline expansion project, North­ern Gateway Pipe­line, and more. Some of these projects involve the transport of natural gas, while oth­ers will carry refined or crude oil—including the particularly filthy Bakken oil.

The proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), which has an an­ticipated construction start date of mid-2017, will—if allowed to pro­ceed—carry fracked natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica shale regions along a route beginning in northwestern West Virginia and ending in southern Virginia, with a detour into Pennsylvania. Objec­tions to the project include the con­duit’s proximity (one-tenth of a mile in some places) to two major water supplies and countless resi­dential wells. The MVP would cross 377 bodies of water, the Ap­palachian Trail and the Blue Ridge Parkway, and could adversely af­fect thousands of acres of forest habitat.

The Diamond Pipeline, which was approved in August of 2016, is intended to transport “sweet” crude oil from Cushing, Oklahoma, across Arkansas, to the Valero Memphis (Tennessee) Refinery. Along the way, the Diamond will cross the Arkansas River, the Illi­nois Bayou, the White River, St. Francis River, and the Mississippi River.

One of the most disturbing as­pects of the Diamond Pipeline is its point of origin. Cushing, Okla­homa, is the self-proclaimed “Pipe­line Crossroads of the World,” a ti­tle proudly announced on signs placed at the entrances and exits to the town, which was once a part of the Sac and Fox reservations. The “tank farm,” which occupies sev­eral square miles, is one of the largest oil storage facilities in the world, and thirteen major pipelines run into and out of the busy hub.

As if pipeline leaks and spills weren’t enough cause for concern, the area surrounding Cushing has recently become in­credibly earth­quake prone, thanks to the large number of waste-water injection wells. The US Geologi­cal Survey reports 825 earthquakes of a 1.5 magnitude or greater in the Cush­ing area between January 14, 2016 and the same date in 2017, with an alarming 5.8 record-setter in nearby Pawnee in September 2016. If Ar­kansas water protectors do not suc­ceed in halting construction, the Dia­mond Pipeline will add one more spoke to Cushing’s mammoth oil storage hub, and will become a major conduit spreading pollution and potential devastation across Ar­kansas, a state that has for years been promoted as “the Natural State.”

Each of the planned, proposed, and under-construction pipelines listed above is deserving of strong opposition, as are the many other pipelines still in the planning and approval stages. Why? Because they are dangerous, as evidenced by the number of leaks, spills, and explosions.

In the six-year period between 2010 and 2016, 4,215 pipeline inci­dents occurred. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration reports that pipeline accidents between 2010 and 2015 were responsible for a to­tal of 7 million gallons of crude oil being leaked into surrounding soil and waterways, and the as-yet-un­tallied quantities lost in 2016 and early 2017 incidents will add significantly to that total. Many of the existing pipelines are old and poorly main­tained, and for some reason, the newer pipelines are even more ac­cident prone.

Human error causes some of the pipeline accidents, while natural occurrences are re­sponsible for oth­ers. In 2013, for example, lightning struck a pipeline in North Dakota, causing 840,000 gallons of crude oil to spill onto a nearby wheat field. One wonders what will hap­pen when the ongoing swarm of fracking-related Okla­homa earth­quakes damages the Cushing oil storage tanks or the pipelines con­nected to the facility.

Oil pollutes the water and land, sickens, and kills. Natural gas con­tributes to climate change, pol­lutes the air, and explodes. Oil and gas pipelines create temporary jobs for a relative few and permanent jobs for a small handful.

In the long run, the only people who benefit fi­nancially from the “Black Snake” are the already wealthy oil corpora­tions. The oil industry gives new meaning to the term “filthy rich,” while individuals living near petro­chemical plants contend with chronic respiratory illnesses and high rates of cancer. With so many clean, green energy sources ready to be put into place, there is no reason to allow the Lakota leg­end of the planet-de­stroying Black Snake to become a permanent and fatal reality.

The turnaround will not hap­pen easily. In fact, it will be quite a struggle. Greed is strong, and the oil corporations wield un­reasonable power—and now they have even more friends in high places, including the one who may as well be referred to as the CEO of the USA. But the previous halting of the Keystone XL, and the tenuous and seemingly temporary victory at Standing Rock have proven that it is indeed possible to make a difference with determination and solidarity.

The frightening number of proposed pipelines and the fact that those pipelines will likely receive swift approval make it clear that the battle for Mother Earth is indeed a war. This war cannot be won by an unknown, faceless “them,” because there is no “them.” There is only us, and each and ev­ery one of us is needed—now.

Teressa Rose Ezell is a St. Louis writer and ac­tivist. She and her fam­ily live in the Tower Grove South neighbor­hood, where she was her district's Green Party candidate for the Mis­souri House of Representa­tives. Teressa can be reached at teres­sa.rose.ezell@gmail.com, or connect via Facebook.

Attack on St. Louis Homeless Foreshadows Things to Come

by Don Fitz 

The sub-freezing temperature was dropping.  As the snow began to fall, many felt their hands were too cold to hold signs during the December 17 action.  Two dozen had answered the Green Party call to picket the mayor of St. Louis for his efforts to close down New Life Evangelistic Center, the city's homeless “shelter-of-last-resort.”  They knew things would be much worse for those forced to sleep in the cold if the shelter were shut down.  The action was one in a series of efforts to draw attention to the city government's ruthless attack on those with no place to go. 

The roots of homelessness are much deeper than cold blooded insensitivity of Republicans.  It reflects a bi-partisan attack on the poorest of the poor.  Efforts to shut down New Life are spearheaded by Francis Slay, the Democratic Party mayor who has championed charter schools over public ones, stymied efforts to create a meaningful Civilian Oversight Board for police violence, and always finds millions upon millions of dollars for sports stadiums while funding for homeless shelters are never adequate.  

Over 40 years ago Rev. Larry Rice began New Life in a part of downtown St. Louis where real estate was cheap.  He expanded the number of homeless he could house to over 200 per night and became somewhat of a folk legend.  But in recent years, buildings near New Life gentrified.  In flocked yuppies and others who sneered at homeless people as beneath them.  Even though the shelter was there first and newcomers were quite aware of who their neighbors would be, many of them acted as if the loft owners had assured them that they could get rid of the unwanted.  

Mayor Slay became their knight in shining armor as he initiated efforts to drive the homeless from the streets of downtown.  Driving people away from where they live due to the increased value of land is a recurring theme in the history of this hemisphere.  For centuries, indigenous peoples have suffered the “extraction curse” when their home are discovered to be located atop gold, silver, tin, lead or adjacent to a potential hydroelectric dam.

This was not lost on several St. Louisans who recently returned from opposing the Dakota Access Pipleline (DAPL).  Corporate executives are eager to sacrifice sacred lands and clean water so they can transport fossil fuel across the US for sale to distant countries.  The Mississippi Standing Action Group joined the Green Party picket because of the painful similarity between dehumanizing native peoples and demonizing the homeless.  

As temperatures plummeted, the mayor's campaign of harassment against New Life swung into full gear.  “It's obscene for Francis Slay to interfere with people trying to bring donations in the cold of winter,” observes Green Party spokeswoman Barbara Chicherio.  “Slay has ordered parking meters to be removed from the entire block in front of New Life.  I have witnessed police telling people that they can no longer stop their cars to bring food and blankets inside.  They have even used taxpayer money to put up signs in front of New Life telling people to take their donations somewhere else.”

For months, Slay has been working to pull corporate media under his umbrella.  Stories of good work done by New Life have almost disappeared from TV and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch as they are replaced by reports confirming what the Democratic Party Mayor wants the public to believe.  The newspeak includes charges that New Life …

1. has to be shut down because it does not comply with codes for building permits;
2. is responsible for a wave of overdoses by those smoking K-2 (synthetic marijuana) in front of it; and,
3. can easily be eliminated because other area shelters can handle those who come there. 

There are a few wee problems with each of these allegations.  As the New Life attorney notes, building codes and ordinances “are so vague and ambiguous that it is impossible to comply.”  The Board of Public Services, which revoked New Life's occupancy permit had no jurisdiction because New Life is not a hotel as it claimed.  Additionally, requiring New Life to obtain signatures of approval by those living nearby is discriminatory in the extreme, since shelters favored by the city are not required to do so.

The charge that New Life is somehow responsible for K-2 overdoses is absurd.  City police refused to respond to 911 calls made by New Life that dealers and thugs were distributing K-2 near the shelter, raising the question of whether city government itself was behind the overdoses.  Checking the public record of 911 calls to respond to K-2 overdoses reveals that they were made all over the downtown area and were definitely not limited to New Life.

Many homeless shelters in St. Louis are doing great work.  City Hall may claim that other shelters can absorb people going to New Life; but the reality for those who suddenly find themselves without a home on a frigid night is quite different.  When people call another shelter, they are likely to find …

• that shelter has restrictions which exclude them; or
• that shelter has a waiting period before they can get a bed; or
• they need a diagnosis before coming in; or
• they can only leave a phone number for an agency which never calls them back; 
• the shelter decided that the cold is not “excessive” because it is not 15 degrees or lower; or
• they are told that the only shelter which can meet their emergency needs is New Life.

Green Party mayoral hopeful Johnathan McFarland believes that “New Life must be kept open because it is the only shelter in St. Louis which takes in homeless people in truly desperate situations.  It is obviously needed because so many people come there.”

While Trump and the Republicans are more blatant in their rhetoric, the slick wordsmithing of Democratic Party politicians like Francis Slay has equally brutal effects.  As capitalism sinks into a feeding frenzy to extract profits from every acre of native land and urban real estate, it uses whatever technique it finds most useful.  In St. Louis and Standing Rock, its focus is on those who have the least power to resist.  It is clearly the time for the left to unite in their defense.  If we do not, the 1% will intensify their efforts to throw environmentalists, trade unionists and social justice activists under the rug. 

Don Fitz is on the Editorial Board of Green Social Thought, which is sent to members of The Greens/Green Party USA.  He produces the show Green Time in conjunction with KNLC-TV in the City of St. Louis and is editor of the Compost-Dispatch newsletter, published for the Green Party of St. Louis.